Winners of the 67th Venice Film Festival
By Sheri Jennings
VENICE, Italy (AP) --Sofia Coppola’s “Somewhere,” the tale of an actor who sees the emptiness of his existence through the eyes of his child, won the top Golden Lion prize at the Venice film festival Saturday.
Director Quentin Tarantino headed the jury, which unanimously chose Coppola’s film as the best movie at the 11-day annual festival.
The buzz in the final days of the festival had pegged “Somewhere” as a sure winner, and the jury appeared to have had no doubts, either.
“This film enchanted us from its first screening,” Tarantino said. “It has the artistry we were looking for in a Golden Lion” winner, he told the closing ceremony.
Coppola has described the film, which made its world premiere at Venice, as a “portrait of today’s L.A.”
“Somewhere” is the fourth feature by Coppola, who is also one of the few female directors ever to be nominated for an Academy Award — for “Lost in Translation”.
In “Somewhere,” Stephen Dorff plays a Hollywood star whose somewhat empty life is enriched by the arrival his daughter, played by Elle Fanning. The film takes place nearly entirely in hotels, mostly the Chateau Marmont in Los Angeles.
Coppola, 39, herself grew up in the world of film thanks to her father, director Francis Ford Coppola. When presenting the film, Coppola reminisced that she and her family spent a lot of time growing up in hotels where her father was out on location while filming.
As a child she stayed at the Marmont with her father. When the film was screened at Venice, early in the festival, Coppola told reporters her father “loved” it.
“Thanks to my dad for teaching me,” Coppola said, accepting the award.
Tarantino paused for a moment and seemed to fight back tears when he was about to announce that Coppola had won the Golden Lion. The two, who dated years ago, warmly hugged each other.
When asked later at a news conference if it was a difficult situation to give the prize to a friend, Tarantino replied that he didn’t “let anything like that affect me.”
“There was no me steering any directions. Sofia doesn’t know any of these other people on the jury and her prize was unanimous,” Tarantino said.
Other awards included the Silver Lion for best director, which went to Alex de la Iglesia for his “Balada triste de Trompeta” (“A Sad Trumpet Ballad”). The Spanish director also won the best screenplay award for the film.
The top actor award was given to Vincent Gallo, who played a terror suspect plotting his escape in “Essential Killing,” by Polish director Jerzy Skolimowski. Best actress honors were awarded to Ariana Lebed, a Greek actress who discovers herself through her friendships, in “Attenberg,” a film by Greek director Athina Rachel Tsangari.
Winners of the 67th Venice Film Festival
Here is a list of winners at the 67th Venice Film Festival which ended Saturday:
Golden Lion for Best Film: “Somewhere” by Sofia Coppola.
Silver Lion for Best Director: Alex de la Iglesia for “Balada Triste de Trompeta.”
Special Jury Prize: “Essential Killing,” directed by Jerzy Skolimowski.
Best Actor: Vincent Gallo in “Essential Killing.”
Best Actress: Ariane Labed in “Attenberg.”
Marcello Mastroianni Award for Best Young Actor or Actress: Mila Kunis in “Black Swan.”
Best Screenplay: Alex de la Iglesia for “Balada Triste de Trompeta.”
Special Lion for Overall Work: Monte Hellman.
Google Opens Its Defense In Antitrust Case Alleging Monopoly Over Online Ad Technology
Google opened its defense against allegations that it holds an illegal monopoly on online advertising technology Friday with witness testimony saying the industry is vastly more complex and competitive than portrayed by the federal government.
"The industry has been exceptionally fluid over the last 18 years," said Scott Sheffer, a vice president for global partnerships at Google, the company's first witness at its antitrust trial in federal court in Alexandria.
The Justice Department and a coalition of states contend that Google built and maintained an illegal monopoly over the technology that facilitates the buying and selling of online ads seen by consumers.
Google counters that the government's case improperly focuses on a narrow type of online ads — essentially the rectangular ones that appear on the top and on the right-hand side of a webpage. In its opening statement, Google's lawyers said the Supreme Court has warned judges against taking action when dealing with rapidly emerging technology like what Sheffer described because of the risk of error or unintended consequences.
Google says defining the market so narrowly ignores the competition it faces from social media companies, Amazon, streaming TV providers and others who offer advertisers the means to reach online consumers.
Justice Department lawyers called witnesses to testify for two weeks before resting their case Friday afternoon, detailing the ways that automated ad exchanges conduct auctions in a matter of milliseconds to determine which ads are placed in front of which consumers and how much they cost.
The department contends the auctions are finessed in subtle ways that benefit Google to the exclusion of would-be competitors and in ways that prevent... Read More