YouTube could help drive traffic to AOL video content
By Andrew Vanacore, Business Writer
NEW YORK (AP) --Google Inc. will continue to provide the search results on AOL Inc.’s websites under a new, five-year deal the companies signed this week.
The agreement largely extends an arrangement that has been in place between the two companies since 2005. But the new contract, announced Thursday, also expands their cooperation onto AOL sites for cell phones and other mobile gadgets. And it will put AOL video content on Google’s YouTube site for the first time.
In its search agreement, AOL shares revenue with Google from the text ads that appear alongside search results.
AOL, which is based in New York, is led by former Google executive Tim Armstrong, who is in the midst of a major overhaul at the Web company. It split from Time Warner Inc. last year and has been trying to grow its online ad business as its dial-up Internet service continues to lose customers to faster broadband connections.
That effort is not proving easy. Last month AOL reported a roughly $1 billion loss for the second quarter, with revenue down by more than a quarter compared with the year before.
Armstrong has remained upbeat, attributing the declines to a necessary paring of assets that are contributing revenue but not enough profit. The latest example was Bebo, a social networking site that AOL sold for a small fraction of the $850 million that it paid in a 2008 acquisition. AOL unsuccessfully tried to build Bebo into a strong competitor to Facebook.
Although AOL declined to give specific financial details, Armstrong called the Google deal a “home run” and framed it as an important step in the turnaround effort.
“We have a very methodical play book for turning AOL around,” Armstrong said in an interview. “And today represented another big step.”
Armstrong said that before deciding to stick with Google, AOL talked with five or six other search providers he wouldn’t name. The deal was done well ahead of the December expiration of their previous agreement.
Still, given Google’s dominant position in the search business and the extra capabilities it has in mobile and online video, the deal was not a surprise.
“While Microsoft’s Bing was probably in the mix, Microsoft is not as ubiquitous as Google is,” said David Joyce, an analyst who follows AOL for Miller Tabak & Co. “One big thing Google has that Microsoft doesn’t is YouTube.”
Joyce said YouTube could be an opportunity for AOL to drive more people to its video content, which would help boost advertising revenue.
Separately this week, MySpace, which is owned by News Corp., extended its search ad partnership with Google by a month while talks continue. The deal had been set to expire at the end of August.
Neither MySpace nor AOL will have a major effect on Google, which has grown at a torrid pace over the past decade.
Google, which is based in Mountain View, Calif., hasn’t disclosed how much revenue it draws from the AOL search deal in years because it isn’t a big enough portion of the total anymore. It accounted for about 7 percent of Google’s annual revenue in 2006, down from 16 percent in 2003. And that’s despite the fact that the value of the contract grew more than threefold from $235 million to $742 million over the same period.
Google also gave up a 5 percent stake in AOL last year as a part of the company’s spinoff from Time Warner. Google took a big loss on the investment and ultimately sold the stake for $283 million after paying $1 billion for it in 2006.
AOL shares rose 6 cents to $22.96 in afternoon trading Thursday, while Google climbed $1.38 to $461.71.
Google Opens Its Defense In Antitrust Case Alleging Monopoly Over Online Ad Technology
Google opened its defense against allegations that it holds an illegal monopoly on online advertising technology Friday with witness testimony saying the industry is vastly more complex and competitive than portrayed by the federal government.
"The industry has been exceptionally fluid over the last 18 years," said Scott Sheffer, a vice president for global partnerships at Google, the company's first witness at its antitrust trial in federal court in Alexandria.
The Justice Department and a coalition of states contend that Google built and maintained an illegal monopoly over the technology that facilitates the buying and selling of online ads seen by consumers.
Google counters that the government's case improperly focuses on a narrow type of online ads — essentially the rectangular ones that appear on the top and on the right-hand side of a webpage. In its opening statement, Google's lawyers said the Supreme Court has warned judges against taking action when dealing with rapidly emerging technology like what Sheffer described because of the risk of error or unintended consequences.
Google says defining the market so narrowly ignores the competition it faces from social media companies, Amazon, streaming TV providers and others who offer advertisers the means to reach online consumers.
Justice Department lawyers called witnesses to testify for two weeks before resting their case Friday afternoon, detailing the ways that automated ad exchanges conduct auctions in a matter of milliseconds to determine which ads are placed in front of which consumers and how much they cost.
The department contends the auctions are finessed in subtle ways that benefit Google to the exclusion of would-be competitors and in ways that prevent... Read More