By Millie Takaki
NEW YORK --Word is that the Screen Actors Guild (SAG), the American Federation of Television and Radio Artists (AFTRA), and the Joint Policy Committee of the Association of National Advertisers and the American Association of Advertising Agencies (JPC) are amenable to temporarily extending the expiration date of their current commercials contract. The actors’ pact is scheduled to expire on Oct. 29.
If the extension comes to pass, it would be agreed to on the grounds that more time is needed for the two sides–the actors’ unions and the JPC–to properly consider alternate compensation models for performers in spots that appear on traditional and/or new media outlets. As earlier reported in SHOOT, the JPC, SAG and AFTRA have invited nine consultants from industry and academia to jointly explore different compensation models in light of the advent of new outlets such as mobile phones, PDAs, VOD and gaming. Additional time would likely be needed to complete the study, and for the actors and ad industry negotiators to evaluate the findings and negotiate a new contract.
The two sides’ request for proposal for the joint study states: “SAG, AFTRA and the JPC realize that any study must be comprehensive and take into consideration the myriad of interests of all the parties–performers and their unions on one hand and advertisers and their partners [advertising agencies–production companies, talent payroll services, casting directors and cost consultants]–on the other hand.”
The call for the development of new compensation models for consideration is generally regarded as a positive step towards hopefully attaining a new agreement without a strike or work stoppage. The actors’ unions went on strike against the ad industry in 2000. That six-month strike exacerbated the runaway production problem, and had a negative impact on the U.S. economy.
Jennifer Kent On Why Her Feature Directing Debut, “The Babadook,” Continues To Haunt Us
"The Babadook," when it was released 10 years ago, didn't seem to portend a cultural sensation.
It was the first film by a little-known Australian filmmaker, Jennifer Kent. It had that strange name. On opening weekend, it played in two theaters.
But with time, the long shadows of "The Babadook" continued to envelop moviegoers. Its rerelease this weekend in theaters, a decade later, is less of a reminder of a sleeper 2014 indie hit than it is a chance to revisit a horror milestone that continues to cast a dark spell.
Not many small-budget, first-feature films can be fairly said to have shifted cinema but Kent's directorial debut may be one of them. It was at the nexus of that much-debated term "elevated horror." But regardless of that label, it helped kicked off a wave of challenging, filmmaker-driven genre movies like "It Follows," "Get Out" and "Hereditary."
Kent, 55, has watched all of this — and those many "Babadook" memes — unfold over the years with a mix of elation and confusion. Her film was inspired in part by the death of her father, and its horror elements likewise arise out of the suppression of emotions. A single mother (Essie Davis) is struggling with raising her young son (Noah Wiseman) years after the tragic death of her husband. A figure from a pop-up children's book begins to appear. As things grow more intense, his name is drawn out in three chilling syllables — "Bah-Bah-Doooook" — an incantation of unprocessed grief.
Kent recently spoke from her native Australia to reflect on the origins and continuing life of "The Babadook."
Q: Given that you didn't set out to in any way "change" horror, how have you regarded the unique afterlife of "The... Read More