Colombia TV Network Cancels Escobars Documentary
By Frank Bajak and Libardo Cardona
BOGOTA, Colombia (AP) --A Colombian TV network on Friday announced its decision not to air a documentary about a Colombian soccer player murdered after accidentally scoring an own-goal in the 1994 World Cup.
The announcement came the same day the slain player’s family held a news conference to say it was deceived by the U.S. makers of the film “The Two Escobars” — an accusation the filmmakers denied.
The family held a news conference in Medellin to complain that brothers Jeff and Michael Zimbalist never told the family they intended to pair the story of Andres Escobar with that of slain drug lord Pablo Escobar.
The two Escobars were unrelated but both hailed from Medellin, which in the early ’90s was a hub of the cocaine trade and the world’s most violent city when measured by its murder rate.
The slain athlete’s brother Santiago Escobar told The Associated Press that the Zimbalist brothers “deceived my family and also deceived the memory of Andres Escobar.”
He read a statement saying that relatives and friends of his brother “feel assaulted in our good faith by the makers of this documentary, who sought our testimony to make a report in homage to the footballer.”
“They never told us that it would be parallel with the drug trafficker Pablo Escobar.”
The Zimbalist brothers, who wrote and directed the film, told the AP by telephone from the United States that the family’s statement was a misrepresentation of their behavior as filmmakers.
They said they were open with the family and friends of Andres Escobar when they told them they wanted to tell the story of the “gentleman of the soccer pitch” in a context appropriate for an international audience.
Andres Escobar was outspoken in his rejection of the poisoning influence of drug money on the sport and the film sensitively reflects that, Michael Zimbalist said.
“We have a lot of respect for Andres Escobar and for his family and it’s always been our intention to be as sensitive as possible,” added Jeff Zimbalist. He said he and his brother “don’t pretend to have any idea how much pain and trauma they’ve been through.”
Pablo Escobar, a soccer aficionado who built playing fields in poor neighborhoods of Medellin, bought politicians while holding the Colombian state hostage as he used terror to fight extradition to the United States. He was killed by police in December 1993.
Andres Escobar, the 27-year-old national team captain, was killed the following July, just 10 days after the own-goal against the United States that eliminated Colombia from the tournament.
“Through the glory and the tragedy, ‘The Two Escobars’ daringly investigates the secret marriage of crime and sport, and uncovers the surprising connections between the murders of Andres and Pablo,” says a description of the film on the website of ESPN, which broadcast it June 21 in the United States.
The Zimbalists, who grew up in Northampton, Mass. said ESPN holds international distribution rights to the film.
They said they did not know why the Colombian TV network RCN had decided not to broadcast the documentary on Sunday as scheduled.
Network spokeswoman Yolima Celis would not explain the decision but said it was made Friday morning. She said she did not know if the Escobar family had called RCN to complain beforehand, adding that negotiations with representatives of the filmmakers had not concluded and that the broadcast could have been canceled “for both reasons.”
“The Two Escobars” premiered earlier this year at the Tribeca Film Festival in New York City.
Michael Zimbalist said he and his brother had been in touch with Andres Escobar’s sister Maria Ester, who appears in the film, in recent months over concerns the family expressed about it.
“Ultimately this wasn’t a story about Andres Escobar and it wasn’t a story about Pablo Escobar,” he said. “It was the story of the Colombian people during a slice of history and it was a universal tale.”
Google Opens Its Defense In Antitrust Case Alleging Monopoly Over Online Ad Technology
Google opened its defense against allegations that it holds an illegal monopoly on online advertising technology Friday with witness testimony saying the industry is vastly more complex and competitive than portrayed by the federal government.
"The industry has been exceptionally fluid over the last 18 years," said Scott Sheffer, a vice president for global partnerships at Google, the company's first witness at its antitrust trial in federal court in Alexandria.
The Justice Department and a coalition of states contend that Google built and maintained an illegal monopoly over the technology that facilitates the buying and selling of online ads seen by consumers.
Google counters that the government's case improperly focuses on a narrow type of online ads — essentially the rectangular ones that appear on the top and on the right-hand side of a webpage. In its opening statement, Google's lawyers said the Supreme Court has warned judges against taking action when dealing with rapidly emerging technology like what Sheffer described because of the risk of error or unintended consequences.
Google says defining the market so narrowly ignores the competition it faces from social media companies, Amazon, streaming TV providers and others who offer advertisers the means to reach online consumers.
Justice Department lawyers called witnesses to testify for two weeks before resting their case Friday afternoon, detailing the ways that automated ad exchanges conduct auctions in a matter of milliseconds to determine which ads are placed in front of which consumers and how much they cost.
The department contends the auctions are finessed in subtle ways that benefit Google to the exclusion of would-be competitors and in ways that prevent... Read More