By Jake Coyle
Richard III didn't need a horse for his kingdom. He just needed Philippa Langley.
Langley, a single mother and amateur historian living in Edinburgh, Scotland, became increasingly obsessed with the late English monarch, long portrayed as one of the great villains of history. In the supposedly hunchbacked king who was said to have killed his nephews, Langley and others suspected a centurieslong smear campaign.
The long-held consensus on Richard III had been shaped by the Tudors, who killed Richard and assumed the throne. It's a narrative, of course, forever since solidified by Shakespeare's great play. For Richard and his sympathizers, it's been not just a winter of discontent but some 500 years. "Every tale condemns me for a villain," the king says in "Richard III."
Except for "The Lost King."
Stephen Frears' new film, which opens in theaters Friday, dramatizes the true tale of Langley's dogged pursuit to unearth the true story of Richard as well as his actual, long-lost remains — a journey that leads, remarkably, to a parking lot in Leicester.
It's the kind of comic, eminently British underdog story that Frears excels at. And with Sally Hawkins playing Langley as a woman undeterred by pompous academics and condescending naysayers, "The Lost King" makes for a charmingly droll tale of long-ago and not-so-long-ago reappraisal.
"The Lost King" — which could make a good double feature with Al Pacino's "Looking for Richard" — reteams much of the creative team behind Frears' Oscar-nominated 2013 film "Philomena." It's penned by Steve Coogan and Jeff Pope and based on Langley's memoir. Coogan also plays Langley's estranged husband, who maintains a mostly supportive relationship with her while sharing custody of their sons.
Despite it being a far more modest mystery than "North by Northwest" — playing out mostly at kitchen tables, bookstores and the pub meetings of the Richard III Society — Frears gives his modest film a few big-screen flourishes, including Saul Bass-like opening credits and a Bernard Herrmann-like score by Alexandre Desplat. There's an innocent man here, too. He just happens to be half a millennium old.
But mostly, Frears sensibly sticks to capturing every quicksilver gesture of the brilliant Hawkins. When we meet Hawkins' Langley, she's reached a middle-age ebb. Troubled by chronic fatigue syndrome, Langley is passed over at work. Her marriage has fallen apart. She's withdrawing from life. But after attending a performance of "Richard III," she's captivated by the monarch and recognizes in him someone else who's been unfairly written off for their supposed disability. When she dives into researching Richard and eventually spearheads a dig in Leicester, Langley's crusade is a doubled one: to resurrect a marginalized monarch and to assert her own place in the world.
Along the way, Langley is visited by Richard III himself, in the form of the actor (Harry Lloyd) who played him in the production that inspired her in the first place. These are muted scenes as far as apparitions go. I can't help wondering if here might have been Coogan's chance to play a war general and trot out his "Gentlemen to bed" line from "The Trip." But as it is, Coogan is nicely low-key in "The Lost King" and gets one of the film's best monologues, lamenting both the demonizing and sanctifying of historical figures, or anybody. "We're all in the middle," he says.
"The Lost King" very contentedly resides in that middle with a protagonist who accomplishes something extraordinary despite being repeatedly told how ordinary she is. Frears, who has found humanity in royalty and nobility in nobodies, animates every scene with little comic touches of everyday life. Richard may be validated but there are bad guys, here, too. In the film's final third, University of Leicester officials descend to take the spotlight from Langley — a characterization the university has called unfair and inaccurate. The wheel goes round: If one villain leaves the stages, another must enter.
"The Lost King," an IFC Films release, is rated PG-13 by the Motion Picture Association for some strong language and brief suggestive references. Running time: 109 minutes. Three stars out of four.
Jake Coyle is an AP film writer
Jennifer Kent On Why Her Feature Directing Debut, “The Babadook,” Continues To Haunt Us
"The Babadook," when it was released 10 years ago, didn't seem to portend a cultural sensation.
It was the first film by a little-known Australian filmmaker, Jennifer Kent. It had that strange name. On opening weekend, it played in two theaters.
But with time, the long shadows of "The Babadook" continued to envelop moviegoers. Its rerelease this weekend in theaters, a decade later, is less of a reminder of a sleeper 2014 indie hit than it is a chance to revisit a horror milestone that continues to cast a dark spell.
Not many small-budget, first-feature films can be fairly said to have shifted cinema but Kent's directorial debut may be one of them. It was at the nexus of that much-debated term "elevated horror." But regardless of that label, it helped kicked off a wave of challenging, filmmaker-driven genre movies like "It Follows," "Get Out" and "Hereditary."
Kent, 55, has watched all of this โ and those many "Babadook" memes โ unfold over the years with a mix of elation and confusion. Her film was inspired in part by the death of her father, and its horror elements likewise arise out of the suppression of emotions. A single mother (Essie Davis) is struggling with raising her young son (Noah Wiseman) years after the tragic death of her husband. A figure from a pop-up children's book begins to appear. As things grow more intense, his name is drawn out in three chilling syllables โ "Bah-Bah-Doooook" โ an incantation of unprocessed grief.
Kent recently spoke from her native Australia to reflect on the origins and continuing life of "The Babadook."
Q: Given that you didn't set out to in any way "change" horror, how have you regarded the unique afterlife of "The... Read More